Varenicline Tartrat Yusuf Analyzer: : Jinayat Vs Human Right

In today's era of openness that the trigger also with the freedom of the press to access news from anywhere in the world. Its certainly not alien to us to hear human rights terms.
human rights at the pass by the UN on 1948 and was implemented throughout the world, particularly in view of the members of the UN.
And of course it is the foundation of human rights oppression and discontent among the marginalized (such as: race, the destitute / city proletariat) against the bourgeois / ruler.
Every man must have wanted to feel the freedom in any case. Human rights in general meant as a protector of individual freedom, anything goes as long as not to disturb others. For Human Rights is the fruit of thought from the west, then the values represent the needs of those who later adopted by countries like Indonesia.

Whereas in Islam in the fifth century there had already contains rules on the protection of human rights, the Charter of Medina, a plaque containing the agreement between the Muslims in terms of freedom of religion, culture, customs, etc..
This is the Act that there has been no match for him until now, because the set about the unity of religion, citizens, minorities, national defense, political, peace, etc..

No discrimination in Islam,…!
And Islamic law in any setting, Islam always uphold human rights, including the application of "qanun jinayat" qanun jinayat in particular Aceh his experience is very much controversy not only among the community, but also expanded into international circles, even by adherents hedoisme think that adultery / prostitution is a common requirement, and should be done. This is very common in the western world is experiencing spiritual crisis in their lives, even they are in protecting the government, until the end of his thinking was much influenced by the western Muslim world that sometimes swallowed them raw without any critical thinking of the Muslim.
In Aceh, scholars and politicians agree the law impose a whip / stoning in Aceh.
law is the law of stoning to death, by stoning, the law is only done in cases of highly disgraceful condition absolutely convinced that someone has proven adultery, that is by attending four of his witnesses.
Implementation of the law by stoning is not so easy. No blemish, disability and human rights violations in the execution of such punishment, in comparison with the slaughter forward towards a third world country….!

In Islam, the implementation of stoning sentence on intended as preventive measures, and at the same deterrent effect purification. Not too bad / negative view of his qanun jinayat this special law stipulating the existence of stoning, which led to immoral acts do not happen again.
The most important thing now is to disseminate the public about this law in order to avoid misunderstanding in terms of the nature of law itself.

But can not deny the implementation of which occurred in the field who sometimes very deviant from the norms of law and fact. Back to those who implement the law, not of "law" itself, because sometime very much self interest in this particular implementation of the law.
And are crucial for positive participation from communities and from different factions of course, like a student and everyone. For the implementation of its laws in order to avoid implementation of its laws to prevent abuses that can lead to bad image against Islam.

*What must I add before I presentation?
our title is ' Does can punishment "jinayat" against human right?' but,,, we must answer 'NO'
*********